Twitter Bans All Political Ads in Response to Concerns Around Misinformation


While the debate around how social platforms should address political speech and misinformation intensifies, Twitter has made the major announcement that it will move to ban all political ads on its platform, in order to distance itself from such concerns.

jack 🌍🌏🌎

@jack

We’ve made the decision to stop all political advertising on Twitter globally. We believe political message reach should be earned, not bought. Why? A few reasons…🧵

122K people are talking about this

Dorsey further explains his logic in the ensuing tweet thread – according to Dorsey:

“A political message earns reach when people decide to follow an account or retweet. Paying for reach removes that decision, forcing highly optimized and targeted political messages on people. We believe this decision should not be compromised by money.”

Dorsey says that the power of targeted social media advertising brings significant risks to politics, “where it can be used to influence votes to affect the lives of millions”.

2019 Survey Report: The Case for an Employee Advocacy Program

We interviewed over 400 marketers on how they leverage employee advocacy programs to power their business. Discover how these programs can provide opportunities for growth in an ever-changing marketing landscape.

Download

This was most clearly evident in the 2016 US Presidential campaign, where expert groups used the data and ad targeting tools provided by Facebook and other networks to deliver very specific messaging, in order to influence behavior among voter segments. And while there’s no way to quantify exactly what impact such efforts had on the final outcome, given the scale and reach of such platforms, combined with their active engagement, it’s likely that social platforms were key in amplifying – even weaponizing – this type of messaging.

“Internet political ads present entirely new challenges to civic discourse: machine learning-based optimization of messaging and micro-targeting, unchecked misleading information, and deep fakes. All at increasing velocity, sophistication, and overwhelming scale. These challenges will affect ALL internet communication, not just political ads. Best to focus our efforts on the root problems, without the additional burden and complexity taking money brings. Trying to fix both means fixing neither well, and harms our credibility.”

Dorsey’s stance comes in stark contrast to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who recently gave a public address in which he championed the role of social platforms in facilitating free speech – which, in Zuckerberg’s view, includes enabling politicians to not only advertise on Facebook and Instagram, but to essentially say whatever they want in their ads. From there, the people can debate, and come to their own conclusions on what’s true and what’s not in such promotional messaging.

Dorsey criticized Zuckerberg’s stance, saying that Zuckerberg had a “major gap and flaw” in his argument, with reach and amplification – not addressed by Zuckerberg – playing a key role in the process.

Dorsey again took direct aim at Zuckerberg and Facebook within his tweet thread:

“It‘s not credible for us to say: “We’re working hard to stop people from gaming our systems to spread misleading info, buuut if someone pays us to target and force people to see their political ad…well…they can say whatever they want!” 

Dorsey says that they did consider only stopping ads from candidates, but that option wouldn’t be effective, so they have opted to stop all political ads of all types. Dorsey also called for more forward-looking political ad regulation, incorporating digital platforms, in order to ensure a level playing field in future.

Dorsey says that Twitter will release is official political ads policy by 11/15, which will include a few exceptions (“ads in support of voter registration will still be allowed, for instance”). The new policies will go into effect on 11/22, providing advertisers with enough notice before it goes into effect.

It’s a major move by Twitter, and a major announcement from Dorsey himself, backing up his statements in criticism of Zuckerberg and Facebook.

“This isn’t about free expression. This is about paying for reach. And paying to increase the reach of political speech has significant ramifications that today’s democratic infrastructure may not be prepared to handle. It’s worth stepping back in order to address.”

Facebook is still standing firm on its political ad stance, despite even its own staff calling for it to re-assess.

Will Twitter’s decision force a re-think among other digital platforms? Will it work the way Dorsey intends?

Interesting times ahead for political advertisers, and the impacts of such more broadly.

Follow Andrew Hutchinson on Twitter

Twitter Bans All Political Ads in Response to Concerns Around Misinformation admin Tổng hợp
While the debate around how social platforms should address political speech and misinformation intensifies, Twitter has made the major announcement that it will move to ban all political ads on its platform, in order to distance itself from such concerns. jack  ✔@jack We’ve made the decision to stop all political advertising on Twitter globally....
<div class=" article-body"> While the debate around <a href="https://www.socialmediatoday.com/news/facebook-wont-stop-lies-in-political-ads-heres-what-it-should-do-instea/566127/">how social platforms should address political speech</a> and misinformation intensifies, Twitter has made the major announcement that it will move to ban all political ads on its platform, in order to distance itself from such concerns. <div align="center"> <div class="SandboxRoot env-bp-350" data-twitter-event-id="0"> <div id="twitter-widget-0" class="EmbeddedTweet EmbeddedTweet--cta js-clickToOpenTarget" lang="en" data-click-to-open-target="https://twitter.com/jack/status/1189634360472829952" data-iframe-title="Twitter Tweet" data-scribe="page:tweet" data-twitter-event-id="1"> <div class="EmbeddedTweet-tweetContainer"> <div class="EmbeddedTweet-tweet"> <blockquote class="Tweet h-entry js-tweetIdInfo subject expanded" cite="https://twitter.com/jack/status/1189634360472829952" data-tweet-id="1189634360472829952" data-scribe="section:subject"> <div class="Tweet-header"><a class="TweetAuthor-avatar Identity-avatar u-linkBlend" href="https://twitter.com/jack" data-scribe="element:user_link"><img class="Avatar" src="https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1115644092329758721/AFjOr-K8_normal.jpg" alt="" data-scribe="element:avatar" data-src-2x="https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1115644092329758721/AFjOr-K8_bigger.jpg" data-src-1x="https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1115644092329758721/AFjOr-K8_normal.jpg" /></a> <div class="TweetAuthor js-inViewportScribingTarget" data-scribe="component:author"> <div class="TweetAuthor-nameScreenNameContainer"><span class="TweetAuthor-decoratedName"><span class="TweetAuthor-decoratedName"><span class="TweetAuthor-name Identity-name customisable-highlight" title="jack 🌍🌏🌎" data-scribe="element:name">jack <img class="Emoji Emoji--forText" title="Earth globe europe-africa" draggable="false" src="https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f30d.png" alt="🌍" /><img class="Emoji Emoji--forText" title="Earth globe asia-australia" draggable="false" src="https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f30f.png" alt="🌏" /><img class="Emoji Emoji--forText" title="Earth globe americas" draggable="false" src="https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f30e.png" alt="🌎" /></span></span></span> <div class="Icon Icon--verified " title="Verified Account"></div> <span class="TweetAuthor-decoratedName"><span class="TweetAuthor-verifiedBadge" data-scribe="element:verified_badge"><b class="u-hiddenVisually">✔</b></span></span><span class="TweetAuthor-screenName Identity-screenName" dir="ltr" title="@jack" data-scribe="element:screen_name">@jack</span></div> </div> <div class="Tweet-brand"></div> </div> <div class="Tweet-body e-entry-content" data-scribe="component:tweet"> <div class="Tweet-target js-inViewportScribingTarget"></div> <p class="Tweet-text e-entry-title" dir="ltr" lang="en">We’ve made the decision to stop all political advertising on Twitter globally. We believe political message reach should be earned, not bought. Why? A few reasons…<img class="Emoji Emoji--forText" title="Thread" draggable="false" src="https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f9f5.png" alt="🧵" /></p> <div class="TweetInfo"> <div class="TweetInfo-like"> <div data-scribe="element:heart"></div> <a class="TweetInfo-heart" title="Like" href="https://twitter.com/intent/like?tweet_id=1189634360472829952" data-scribe="component:actions"><span class="TweetInfo-heartStat" data-scribe="element:heart_count">430K</span></a></div> <div class="TweetInfo-timeGeo"><a class="u-linkBlend u-url customisable-highlight long-permalink" href="https://twitter.com/jack/status/1189634360472829952" data-datetime="2019-10-30T20:05:08+0000" data-scribe="element:full_timestamp"><time class="dt-updated" title="Time posted: October 30, 2019 20:05:08 (UTC)" datetime="2019-10-30T20:05:08+0000">3:05 AM - Oct 31, 2019</time></a></div> <div class="tweet-InformationCircle" data-scribe="element:notice"><a class="Icon Icon--informationCircleWhite js-inViewportScribingTarget" title="Twitter Ads info and privacy" href="https://support.twitter.com/articles/20175256"><span class="u-hiddenVisually">Twitter Ads info and privacy</span></a></div> </div> </div></blockquote> </div> <div class="CallToAction-icon" data-scribe="element:conversation_icon"></div> <div class="CallToAction-text" data-scribe="element:conversation_text">122K people are talking about this</div> <div class="CallToAction-chevron" data-scribe="element:cta_chevron"></div> </div> </div> <div class="resize-sensor"></div> </div> </div> Dorsey further explains his logic in the ensuing <a href="https://twitter.com/jack/status/1189634360472829952">tweet thread</a> - according to Dorsey: <em>"A political message earns reach when people decide to follow an account or retweet. Paying for reach removes that decision, forcing highly optimized and targeted political messages on people. We believe this decision should not be compromised by money."</em> Dorsey says that the power of targeted social media advertising brings significant risks to politics, "where it can be used to influence votes to affect the lives of millions". <div class="hybrid-ad-wrapper hide-small show-large"> <div class="hybrid-ad-inner-wrapper"> <div class="hide-small show-large"> <div data-container-ad-unit-id="/21662595662/socialmediatoday/socialmediatodayhybrid2-desktop"> <div class="row native-ad brand-studio"> <div class="medium-3 columns native-ad-image-wrapper"><img class="native-ad-image" src="https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/pagead/imgad?id=CICAgKDH24TabRABGAEyCIJcju_ukFqO" alt="" /></div> <div class="medium-9 columns native-ad-copy-wrapper"> <div class="native-ad-sponsor"><img class="brand-studio-logo" src="https://d12v9rtnomnebu.cloudfront.net/logo/brand_studio_logo.png" alt="" /></div> <a class="native-ad-title" href="https://adclick.g.doubleclick.net/pcs/click?xai=AKAOjstJu-X9vzrF5KfdY312rMdYaqBQ80ZdwkpJhOxSKNcEvBGMpjYtWIm_03M1v1z5sc-1DNbku-tW6EHdqVjdiTR1zH2qO8O-R6xq87nbTu-BQIGJlFN_6umSgfZJzGRmZAUZ_EeSqndfv0HofkbCWhQfll0A4QckYs4u_W7gd5B9gMV7q0TiWwJHQSoFDvD4qE2XB6fQJVFJSBrL-irjldzbTbYI-ei44rA1G7-bAt0522ic18pp41Gij7L8Fod7nD3uaT5D-YU2WNK01uV-yc3od9xA5NWO7Qsga5m1FawFuQS3x6p3EK-6&sig=Cg0ArKJSzKWqXgvegy-IEAE&urlfix=1&adurl=https://resources.industrydive.com/building-the-case-for-an-employee-advocacy-program%3Futm_source%3DSMT%26utm_medium%3DNative%26utm_campaign%3DGaggleAMP" target="_blank">2019 Survey Report: The Case for an Employee Advocacy Program</a> <p class="native-ad-copy">We interviewed over 400 marketers on how they leverage employee advocacy programs to power their business. Discover how these programs can provide opportunities for growth in an ever-changing marketing landscape.</p> <a class="button material brand-studio" href="https://adclick.g.doubleclick.net/pcs/click?xai=AKAOjstJu-X9vzrF5KfdY312rMdYaqBQ80ZdwkpJhOxSKNcEvBGMpjYtWIm_03M1v1z5sc-1DNbku-tW6EHdqVjdiTR1zH2qO8O-R6xq87nbTu-BQIGJlFN_6umSgfZJzGRmZAUZ_EeSqndfv0HofkbCWhQfll0A4QckYs4u_W7gd5B9gMV7q0TiWwJHQSoFDvD4qE2XB6fQJVFJSBrL-irjldzbTbYI-ei44rA1G7-bAt0522ic18pp41Gij7L8Fod7nD3uaT5D-YU2WNK01uV-yc3od9xA5NWO7Qsga5m1FawFuQS3x6p3EK-6&sig=Cg0ArKJSzKWqXgvegy-IEAE&urlfix=1&adurl=https://resources.industrydive.com/building-the-case-for-an-employee-advocacy-program%3Futm_source%3DSMT%26utm_medium%3DNative%26utm_campaign%3DGaggleAMP" target="_blank">Download</a></div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> This was most clearly evident in the <a href="https://www.socialmediatoday.com/news/how-will-facebook-change-in-the-wake-of-the-cambridge-analytica-issue/520103/">2016 US Presidential campaign</a>, where expert groups used the data and ad targeting tools provided by Facebook and other networks to deliver very specific messaging, in order to influence behavior among voter segments. And while there's no way to quantify exactly what impact such efforts had on the final outcome, given the scale and reach of such platforms, combined with their active engagement, it's likely that social platforms were key in amplifying - even weaponizing - this type of messaging. <em>"Internet political ads present entirely new challenges to civic discourse: machine learning-based optimization of messaging and micro-targeting, unchecked misleading information, and deep fakes. All at increasing velocity, sophistication, and overwhelming scale. These challenges will affect ALL internet communication, not just political ads. Best to focus our efforts on the root problems, without the additional burden and complexity taking money brings. Trying to fix both means fixing neither well, and harms our credibility."</em> Dorsey's stance comes in stark contrast to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who recently <a href="https://www.socialmediatoday.com/news/zuckerbergs-attempt-to-clarify-facebooks-stance-on-political-ads-leaves-m/565320/">gave a public address</a> in which he championed the role of social platforms in facilitating free speech - which, in Zuckerberg's view, includes enabling politicians to not only advertise on Facebook and Instagram, but to essentially say whatever they want in their ads. From there, the people can debate, and come to their own conclusions on what's true and what's not in such promotional messaging. Dorsey <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-10-24/dorsey-criticizes-zuckerberg-over-free-speech-argument">criticized Zuckerberg's stance</a>, saying that Zuckerberg had a “major gap and flaw” in his argument, with reach and amplification - not addressed by Zuckerberg - playing a key role in the process. Dorsey again took direct aim at Zuckerberg and Facebook within his tweet thread: <em>"It‘s not credible for us to say: “We’re working hard to stop people from gaming our systems to spread misleading info, buuut if someone pays us to target and force people to see their political ad…well...they can say whatever they want!" </em> <div id="inline-signup-location"> <div class="inline-signup"> <p class="inline-signup__copy">Get social media news like this in your inbox daily. Subscribe to Social Media Today:</p> <form id="signup_right_sidebar" class="form js-form-email-validate" action="https://www.socialmediatoday.com/signup/" method="POST" name="signup" target="_blank"><label class="email-input js-email-input" for="id_6cfad6_email"><span class="screen-reader-text">Email:</span><input id="id_6cfad6_email" class="email" name="email" required="" type="email" placeholder="Enter your work email" /></label><button class="button button--loud button--full-width" type="submit" value="Sign up"><img class="button__icon button__icon--left" src="https://www.socialmediatoday.com/static/img/components/buttons/email.svg?274214160519" alt="email icon" /> Sign up</button> <p class="help-text help-text--small">By signing up you agree to our <a href="http://www.industrydive.com/privacy-policy/" target="_blank">privacy policy</a>. You can opt out anytime.</p> </form></div> </div> Dorsey says that they did consider only stopping ads from candidates, but that option wouldn't be effective, so they have opted to stop all political ads of all types. Dorsey also called for more forward-looking political ad regulation, incorporating digital platforms, in order to ensure a level playing field in future. Dorsey says that Twitter will release is official political ads policy by 11/15, which will include a few exceptions ("ads in support of voter registration will still be allowed, for instance"). The new policies will go into effect on 11/22, providing advertisers with enough notice before it goes into effect. It's a major move by Twitter, and a major announcement from Dorsey himself, backing up his statements in criticism of Zuckerberg and Facebook. <em>"This isn’t about free expression. This is about paying for reach. And paying to increase the reach of political speech has significant ramifications that today’s democratic infrastructure may not be prepared to handle. It’s worth stepping back in order to address."</em> Facebook is still standing firm on its political ad stance, despite <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2019/10/28/facebook-employees-vs-ad-lies/">even its own staff</a> calling for it to re-assess. Will Twitter's decision force a re-think among other digital platforms? Will it work the way Dorsey intends? Interesting times ahead for political advertisers, and the impacts of such more broadly. </div> <div class="editor-box"> Follow Andrew Hutchinson on <a href="https://www.twitter.com/adhutchinson">Twitter</a> </div>

Related Posts

Facebook Launches Updated Company Logo Which Will be Included in All of its Apps

No Comments Yet

Leave a Reply

Tien HoangDigital Marketing2019